Sports Matter 2014

I attended a segment of “Sports Matters” (http://sportsmatters.asia/) today.

The segment I attended was a 1 hour panel discussion revolving around the following question:

“Is globalisation of sport a good thing?”

Frankly, I don’t understand most of the details in the discussion. This is due to my (obvious) lack of knowledge and experience.

Nevertheless, I kept an open mind and stayed calm.

Most of the discussion – from the way I interpret – appear to revolve around the ability to “localise” (bring relevance to the target country in question) sport, and also the role of sponsorship.

Obviously, being the inquisitive me, I asked a question when the moderator offered the opportunity to the floor.

I asked “What do you think the globalization of sports means for Sports Hub? Do you think it will increase attendance at major sports events at it? “. My question was directed towards Andrew Georgiou, who is currently the CEO of World Sports Group (WSG). WSG is part of the Singapore Sports Hub consortium.

In essence, his reply was Singaporeans would attend events if they see relevance. It isn’t an issue of whether the events are major or not.

At the end of the day, I’m just glad I didn’t have to pay a single cent to attend this event (it is priced in the hundreds) because my University had an offer/waiver, and I managed to get a glimpse into the world of sports business.

20140918_150347

On Myers Briggs Personality Test

Since I noticed that the questions appear to require context, I took context into consideration when answering them.

Of course, I don’t think that everything fits me, so I am selecting notable ones that I think fits.

Context: In school and *ideally* at work

Results: ENTJ (http://www.16personalities.com/entj-personality)

Notable results:

1) “At the negotiating table, be it in a corporate environment or buying a car, ENTJs are dominant, relentless, and unforgiving.”

2) “Emotional expression isn’t the strong suit of any Analyst (NT) type, but because of their Extroverted (E) nature, ENTJs’ distance from their emotions is especially public, and felt directly by a much broader swath of people. Especially in a professional environment, ENTJs will simply crush the sensitivities of those they view as inefficient, incompetent or lazy.”

3) “ENTJs exemplify the difference between moment-to-moment crisis management and navigating the challenges and steps of a bigger plan, and are known for examining every angle of a problem and not just resolving momentary issues, but moving the whole project forward with their solutions.”

4) “”It’s my way or the highway” – People with the ENTJ personality type are notoriously unsupportive of any idea that distracts from their primary goals, and even more so of ideas based on emotional considerations. ENTJs won’t hesitate a second to make that fact clear to those around them.”

Context: With family, friends and at non-profit causes (eg charity, raise awareness of deaf, underprivilged, etc)

Results: INFJ (http://www.16personalities.com/infj-personality)

Notable results:

1) “Few personality types are as sensitive and mysterious as INFJs. Your imagination and empathy make you someone who not only cherishes their integrity and deeply held principles but, unlike many other idealistic types, is also capable of turning those ideals into plans, and executing them.”

2) “Combining a vivid imagination with a strong sense of compassion, INFJs use their creativity to resolve not technical challenges, but human ones. People with the INFJ personality type enjoy finding the perfect solution for someone they care about, and this strength makes them excellent counselors and advisors.”

3) “Seeing through dishonesty and disingenuous motives, INFJs step past manipulation and sales tactics and into a more honest discussion. INFJs see how people and events are connected, and are able to use that insight to get to the heart of the matter.”

4) “When INFJs come to believe that something is important, they pursue that goal with a conviction and energy that can catch even their friends and loved ones off guard. INFJs will rock the boat if they have to, something not everyone likes to see, but their passion for their chosen cause is an inseparable part of their personality.”

5) “INFJs like to know that they are taking concrete steps towards their goals, and if routine tasks feel like they are getting in the way, or worse yet, there is no goal at all, they will feel restless and disappointed.”

6) “When it comes to romantic relationships, INFJs take the process of finding a partner seriously. Not ones for casual encounters, people with the INFJ personality type instead look for depth and meaning in their relationships.”

7) “INFJs will go out of their way to seek out people who share their desire for authenticity, and out of their way to avoid those who don’t, especially when looking for a partner.”

8) “From the start, it can be a challenge to get to know INFJs, as they are very private, even enigmatic. INFJs don’t readily share their thoughts and feelings, not unless they are comfortable, and since those thoughts and feelings are the basis for INFJ friendships, it can take time and persistence to get to know them. Meanwhile, INFJs are very insightful and have a particular knack for seeing beyond others’ facades, interpreting intent and compatibility quickly and easily, and weeding out those who don’t share the depth of their idealism.”

9) “Once a common thread is found though, people with the INFJ personality type make loyal and supportive companions, encouraging growth and life-enriching experiences with warmth, excitement and care. As trust grows, INFJs will share more of what lies beneath the surface, and if those ideas and motives are mutual, it’s the sort of friendship that will transcend time and distance, lasting a lifetime. INFJs don’t require a great deal of day-to-day attention – for them, quality trumps quantity every time, and over the years they will likely end up with just a few true friendships, built on a richness of mutual understanding that forges an indelible link between them.”

personality

Being “idealistic” in the business world?

This was a question and answer in my “Introduction to Information and New Media” module.

Question in the slide: How are tighter finances at media companies affecting news?

What the Prof replied: Newspapers and media companies in general are not making enough money. Some of their revenues have been taken. Digital advertising – people find it more impactful to advertise on the internet, than on radio/tv channels. Cost have gone up: cost of production, land costs and labor costs.

Honestly, the way to go about this is to sensationalise: sensationalise things that are not true (that is the very worse), and even great news companies have done this. That is what the current news review in the UK is about.

The above goes to support the point that once profit making is the top priority in business, you can’t expect to be idealistic about what you do.

skitched-20090731-085927

Thought provoking and helpful nuggets from “Social Psychology” by David Myers


Sharing is caring. I will update this page when appropriate. 🙂

Why social psychology, Zi Siong? Well…

“Social psychology aims to expose us to fallacies in our thinking in the hope that we will
become more rational, more in touch with reality.” [Point number 8 actually, haha]

1) “We find causes where we look for them. To see this in your own experience, consider: Would you say your social psychology instructor is a quiet or a talkative person? My guess is you
inferred that he or she is fairly outgoing. But consider: Your attention focuses on your
instructor while he or she behaves in a public context that demands speaking. The instructor
also observes his or her own behavior in many different situations—in the classroom, in
meetings, at home. “Me talkative?” your instructor might say. “Well, it all depends on the
situation.” ”

2) “People who are more self-conscious attribute their behaviour more to internal factors and less
to the situation.”

3) “The fundamental attribution error: observers underestimating the situation. Driving into a gas
station, we may think the person parked at the second pump (thus blocking access to the first)
is inconsiderate. That person, having arrived when the first pump was in use, attributes her
behavior to the situation.”

4) “From his analysis of 173 studies, Bertram Malle (2006) concluded that the actor-observer
difference is minimal. When our action feels intentional and admirable, we attribute it to our
own good reasons, not to the situation. It’s only when we behave badly that we’re more likely
to attribute our behavior to the situation, while someone observing us may spontaneously infer
a trait.”

5) “We often ignore powerful situational determinants. Why do we tend to underestimate the
situational determinants of others’ behavior but not of our own? Attribution theorists pointed
out that we observe others from a different perspective than we observe ourselves (Jones, 1976;
Jones & Nisbett, 1971). When we act, the environment commands our attention. When we watch
another person act, that person occupies the center of our attention and the environment
becomes relatively invisible.”

6) “People who are merely feigning a position write more forceful statements than you’d expect
(Allison & others, 1993; Miller & others, 1990).”

7) “In real life, those with social power usually initiate and control conversations, which often
leads underlings to overestimate their knowledge and intelligence. Medical doctors, for
example, are often presumed to be experts on all sorts of questions unrelated to medicine.”

8) “Social psychology aims to expose us to fallacies in our thinking in the hope that we will
become more rational, more in touch with reality.”

9) “This tendency resolves a puzzling pair of consistent findings: Those who participate in
psychotherapy and self-improvement programs for weight control, antismoking, and exercise show only modest improvement on average. Yet they often claim considerable benefit (Myers, 2010). Michael Conway and Michael Ross (1986) explain why: Having expended so much time, effort, and money on self-improvement, people may think, “I may not be perfect now, but I was worse before; this did me a lot of good.””

10) “Our memory system is a web of associations, and priming is the awakening or activating of
certain associations. Experiments show that priming one thought, even without awareness, can
influence another thought, or even an action. John Bargh and his colleagues (1996) asked people to complete a sentence containing words such as “old,” “wise,” and “retired.” Shortly
afterward, they observed these people walking more slowly to the elevator than did those not
primed with aging-related words. Moreover, the slow walkers had no awareness of their walking
speed or of having just viewed words that primed aging.”

11) “As social chameleons, those who score high in self-monitoring are also less committed to their relationships and more likely to be dissatisfied in their marriages (Leone & Hawkins, 2006).”

12) “Social networking sites such as Facebook provide a new and sometimes intense venue for self  presentation. They are, says communications professor Joseph Walther, “like impression
management on steroids” (Rosenbloom, 2008). Users make careful decisions about which pictures, activities, and interests to highlight in their profiles. Some even think about how their
friends will affect the impression they make on others; one study found that those with more
attractive friends were perceived as more attractive themselves (Walther & others, 2008). Given
the concern with status and attractiveness on social networking sites, it is not surprising
that people high in narcissistic traits thrive on Facebook, tallying up more friends and
choosing more attractive pictures of themselves (Buffardi & Campbell, 2008).”

13) “When we behave badly or fail in a task, we reassure ourselves by thinking that such lapses
also are common. After one person lies to another, the liar begins to perceive the other person
as dishonest (Sagarin & others, 1998). They guess that others think and act as they do: “I lie,
but doesn’t everyone?” If we cheat on our income taxes or smoke, we are likely to overestimate
the number of other people who do likewise.”

14) “Most cultures native to Asia, Africa, and Central and South America place a greater value on
collectivism. They nurture what Shinobu Kitayama and Hazel Markus (1995) call the
interdependent self. In these cultures, people are more self-critical and have less need for
positive self-regard (Heine & others, 1999). Malaysians, Indians, Japanese, and traditional
Kenyans such as the Maasai, for example, are much more likely than Australians, Americans, and
the British to complete the “I am” statement with their group identities (Kanagawa & others,
2001; Ma & Schoeneman, 1997).

15) “When speaking, people using the languages of collectivist countries say “I” less often (Kashima & Kashima, 1998, 2003). A person might say “Went to the movie” rather than “I went to the movie.” ”

* Collectivism: Giving priority to the goals of one’s groups (often one’s extended family or
work group) and defining one’s identity accordingly.

* Interdependent self: Construing one’s identity in relation to others.

16)
Untitled
17) “With remarkable ease, we form and sustain false beliefs. Led by our preconceptions, feeling overconfident, persuaded by vivid anecdotes, perceiving correlations and control even where none may exist, we construct our social beliefs and then influence others to confirm them. ”

18)
Untitled
1
9)  On how to enhance group brainstorming:Untitled20) 1
2
1) “We are more prone to ingroup bias when our group is small and lower in status relative to the outgroup (Ellemers & others, 1997; Mullen & others, 1992). When we’re part of a small group surrounded by a larger group, we are more conscious of our group membership; when our ingroup is the majority, we think less about it. To be a foreign student, to be gay or lesbian, or to be of a minority race or gender at some social gathering is to feel one’s social identity more keenly and to react accordingly.”

22) “The extra attention we pay to distinctive people creates an illusion that they differ from others more than they really do. If people thought you had the IQ of a genius, they would probably notice things about you that otherwise would pass unnoticed.”

23) Untitled

TED talk on the power of introverts

Just watched this TED talk.

I enjoyed it.

My personal view is that introverts need to position themselves where their abilities and interest lie. I think, and feel, that many introverts are natural leaders. This is especially so for introverts with a clear vision and willingness to achieve a set objective.

Why do I say so?

Such introverts are quiet but acute observers. They are able to detect complex patterns quickly and accurately when some extroverts might not notice. And they do so in a way that serves their vision well. Because of their intimate understanding of complex environments (where they play more of observers initially), and the silent but powerful network they establish with people who share their vision and have unique strengths, they are able to design complex systems and processes and have the neccesary manpower to execute their plans.

But of course, this is not to suggest introverts “rule the world”. Far from it. This is giving balance to perhaps, the belief that only extroverts are capable of helming large organisations. In reality, I think both introverts and extroverts (and this is not a black-and-white concept) have their roles to play.

Therefore, I think introverts should be confident of their abilities, and find the right avenues to express them – at a professional and personal level.

Just my brief opinion though. 🙂

Image

Casual thought

I see so many photos of The 2014 Fitness Summit from folks in the USA.

Just thinking when can my own country have a similar event. Hmm, are we ready to have an event of this calibre? I am confident that if such an event were organised successfully, the fitness industry in Singapore would have greater recognition and be taken more seriously.

Just a passing thought anyway.

A lengthy reflection – Doing what is right in coaching

Posted the following on Facebook:

“I understand that the following is a rant. Very emotional rant. So pardon me if it sounds incoherent to you at times. But I want to write it down because I genuinely care. And share it because I hope you can understand me better. And I will feel better after sharing it.

==

A few people have asked me lately if I would still be competing this year in my sport of powerlifting. My answer has always been along the lines of “I am not sure. I find it difficult to weigh the pros and cons.”. But yesterday, I have came to a very firm decision: I won’t be competing this year.

Why? Because my interest has changed. I am no longer excited by the idea of competing. And I am really falling in love with personal training, and I believe it will be a very rewarding experience. I love to spend A LOT of energy and time into what I really love – the “right” people and interests. I “see” myself wanting to “understand” the person and the thing I am doing. And because our time and energy are limited, tradeoffs have to be made. I can’t devote that much time and mental energy into training specifically for powerlifting competition AFTER I factor in the things I believe I HAVE to do to coach well (just an example: I was listening to fitness podcasts on public transportation during my recent holiday to Taiwan. My brother knows it.) Call me crazy, but it is what it is.

Just recently, I was asked by my client – I only have one client now by the way – “should I swim before or after gym” over Facebook messenging. I told him I would meet him to answer this question, because I feel it is only the “right” thing that my client understands the reasons for things. And to fully do so – I think we would need to talk face to face. Again, I can understand if you respond with “Zi Siong is nuts.”. Yes, sometimes even I think I am nuts, but in this case, have I harmed my client? I don’t think so.

Let me share a short episode of my life: I started going to the gym at the start of secondary 4 (about 7 years ago). Right after my final exam of secondary school ended, I was super excited to hit the gym to deadlift my previous heaviest weight after being away from the gym entirely for more than a month. I ended up injuring my lower back, and I was unable to walk properly for a while. Just imagine trying to pull your feet apart when one is in front of another and there is a strong rubber band tying the two together – yes, that was how it felt.

In retrospect, I could have probably avoided the injury. Why? In short, I didn’t understand WHY I had to lift my previous heaviest weight. If I could turn time back, with my current knowledge and experience, I would not have done so.

My injury was excruciatingly pain both physically AND mentally – I seriously thought back then: would I still be able to lift again?

Fast forward back to today. I really don’t wish to see anyone that holds dearly to me suffer the same fate – getting seriously injured BECAUSE they lacked the right knowledge. You can ask anyone I care for in the gym – Mikhail Ching for example. I have corrected him more than just once on his form. Not after every rep obviously (even I would find that annoying and unneccesary) – but when I spot that something goes awfully wrong.

My client has fully earned my respect. We do know each other for a long time. And I understand that his reasons for coming to me are genuine. He is very serious about his goal, and I want to help him to my best.

I have been told that some of the things I choose to do and say about personal training are “harsh”, “ugly”, “stupid”, “waste time”, and “too serious”. I am sorry, but this is my interest, this is something I feel deeply for. I could care less if the things that I don’t see eye to eye with don’t harm, but lately, some of the things I have came across are jus downright wrong. And some people actually believe them. For example, a personal trainer who is gaining popularity (who I shall not name) told a friend of mine that he eats 12000 kcals and actually swallows his vomit (to get all that 12000kcals down) because that is dedication. No! That is being FUCKING RETARDED. Can SCIENCE say swallowing vomit is “ok”. Why would the personal trainer actually share that? Does he understand that with the number of “followers” he has, some people might actually believe him and copy what he does because it is “dedication”? This is IRRESPONSIBLE beahviour that should not be found in my industry. I could go on more with providing examples, but to do so might put me at legal risk (of being sued).

OK, I really could go on, but I have to stop right now.

I really hope you understand why I choose to do certain things.

Thank you.”

An introspection: Powerlifting – To compete or not in 2014

I am at a lost to answer this question.

Part of me still desires to compete for various reasons.

Another part of me tells me that my time and energy are limited, and my interests in life may have taken another direction. That revolves around expanding myself professionally. And I am not sure if AFTER I factor in training SPECIFICALLY for competing, I would still have time and energy to purposefully expand myself professionally.